AI for Nonprofits: How to Save Time on Grant Applications

Artificial intelligence is transforming how we work, and nonprofits are no exception. But between the hype and the skepticism, it’s hard to know what AI can actually do for your grant program.

The answer isn’t about replacing human judgment—it’s about eliminating tedious tasks so you can focus on what matters: making compelling cases for your mission.

Where AI Actually Helps

Let’s be specific about where AI adds value in grant management:

1. Data Extraction from Documents

Every RFP, grant guidelines document, and funder website contains critical information: deadlines, award amounts, eligibility requirements, and submission instructions.

Manually reading through a 20-page grant guideline to extract these details takes time. AI can scan the document and pull out:

• Application deadline
• Award range
• Eligibility criteria
• Required attachments
• Reporting requirements

Time saved: 15-30 minutes per grant opportunity

2. Summarizing Funder Information

Before applying to a new foundation, you need to research their priorities, past grantees, and application preferences. AI can help by:

• Summarizing annual reports
• Identifying funding patterns from 990 data
• Highlighting alignment with your mission

Time saved: 1-2 hours per funder research session

3. Drafting Report Language

Progress reports and final reports require similar language across grants: describing your programs, quantifying impact, and thanking funders. AI can:

• Generate first drafts based on your program data
• Suggest language for common sections
• Adapt previous reports to new formats

Time saved: 30-60 minutes per report

4. Search and Organization

Finding that one email from a program officer or locating the specific grant agreement with budget details shouldn’t require archaeology. AI-powered search can:

• Find information using natural language queries
• Surface relevant past applications when starting new ones
• Connect related funders and opportunities

Time saved: 5-10 minutes per search (adds up quickly)

What AI Can’t Do

Let’s be equally clear about AI’s limitations:

It Can’t Replace Relationships

Grant success often depends on relationships with program officers. AI can’t attend site visits, build rapport at conferences, or understand the nuances of funder priorities that come from personal connection.

It Can’t Write Compelling Narratives

AI can draft, but it can’t tell your story with authentic passion. The most successful grant applications connect emotionally with readers—they convey why your work matters in a way that only humans who do that work can express.

It Can’t Make Strategic Decisions

Which grants should you pursue? How should you position your organization? What’s the right ask amount? These decisions require judgment that accounts for your organization’s unique context, history, and goals.

It Can’t Guarantee Accuracy

AI makes mistakes. It can misread a deadline, hallucinate requirements that don’t exist, or miss nuances in eligibility criteria. Human review remains essential.

A Practical AI Workflow

Here’s how to integrate AI into your grant process responsibly:

Prospect Research Phase

1. Use AI to summarize funder websites and guidelines
2. Have AI extract key requirements and deadlines
3. Human review: Verify accuracy and assess fit

Application Writing Phase

1. Use AI to generate outline and first draft
2. Pull relevant language from past successful applications
3. Human writing: Craft compelling narratives and customize for funder
4. Human review: Ensure accuracy, voice, and alignment

Reporting Phase

1. Use AI to draft progress reports from your data
2. Generate standard sections (organization description, financials)
3. Human writing: Add context, stories, and strategic framing
4. Human review: Verify numbers and commitments

Common Concerns Addressed

”Won’t funders know if we use AI?”

If you’re using AI to generate generic, impersonal applications—yes, and they won’t be impressed. But if you’re using AI to handle administrative tasks while you focus on authentic storytelling and relationship building, your applications will actually improve.

”Is it ethical to use AI for grant applications?”

The ethics depend on how you use it. Using AI to:

• Extract data from documents ✓
• Generate first drafts you substantially edit ✓
• Handle administrative tasks ✓

Using AI to:

• Submit unreviewed content ✗
• Misrepresent your capabilities ✗
• Deceive funders about your process ✗

“We don’t have budget for AI tools.”

Many AI features are becoming standard in software you may already use. And the time savings often justify modest subscription costs—if AI saves your grant writer 5 hours per month, that’s worth more than most tool subscriptions.

Getting Started

If you’re AI-curious but cautious, start small:

1. Try data extraction. Upload one grant guideline and see how accurately AI pulls out the key details.
2. Test search. Use natural language to find past applications or funder information.
3. Draft one report section. Let AI generate a first draft of your organization description, then edit it to match your voice.

The goal isn’t to automate your grant program—it’s to give your team more time for the work that requires human creativity, judgment, and relationship-building.

The Future Is Augmented, Not Automated

The most successful grant programs will use AI as a tool, not a replacement. Technology handles the tedious; humans handle the meaningful.

When you’re not spending hours extracting data from PDFs or hunting for old emails, you can invest that time in:

• Building funder relationships
• Crafting compelling stories
• Strategic planning
• Program delivery

That’s how AI helps nonprofits succeed—by giving you back time to do what you do best.

---

GrantKit uses AI to extract grant details, power natural language search, and draft reports—so you can focus on your mission. Start your free trial.